Why Swift’s ‘Almost Blockchain’ Functionality Makes It Important

Justin Freeman

Why Swift's 'Almost Blockchain' Functionality Makes It Important

Swift, the international payments system, has suddenly become a mainstream news topic. It’s not every day that money transfers become the subject of high-level meetings between politicians. So, what is it, why is it important, and what do recent news events mean for retail investors?

What is Swift?

The Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication was set up in 1973 by a group of global banks to upgrade their processes for transferring vast sums of money between them.

To say it oils the wheels of industry would be a massive understatement. It now links 11,000 banks worldwide and sends more than 40m messages a day, each one of those messages relating to cash transactions which can be millions of dollars in value. It’s also highly efficient as it uses standard templates and codes, which helps keep transaction costs down.

Think of Swift as operating a blockchain approach

Certain technological advances in the Swift payment system solved problems that cryptocurrencies also addressed when Bitcoin was created more than 30 years later in 2009. They also hint at why the ‘traditional’ banking system might not be in such a need for a makeover as crypto fans claim. Swift payments also have a much smaller carbon footprint than cryptocurrencies which have recently come under fire because of the energy used by crypto.

A Swift payment sent from one bank to another generates two confirmation messages, one that the money has been sent and another that it has arrived. That transparency doesn’t quite match the openness of blockchain, where all parties can see all transactions which take place, but it’s enough to remove the risk of disputes between banks claiming they haven’t received payment.

Why is Swift in the news?

Swift was established by a group of banks wanting to avoid the risk of one of them being the ‘go-to’ processing agent for banking payments. The firm is based in Brussels and is owned by the members of the system. It is overseen by the National Bank of Belgium in partnership with other central banks worldwide, including the Bank of England and the US Federal Reserve.

That governance structure ensures the firm is commercially independent. Whilst essentially neutral in terms of political stance, there is historical precedent for countries being banned from the system, as Iran was in 2012. Reports from news agencies such as the BBC suggest that Russian banks might be stopped from using Swift. Doing so would remove their access to a convenient payment system and cause knock-on effects in the Russian economy.

It’s hard to gauge what impact a ban on Russia using Swift would have on retail investors. That would come down to personal circumstances and any knock-on effects. However, the situation highlights why it is essential to consider a broker’s operational and regulatory structure when selecting a platform to support your trading.

 

Crowdsourcing information about scam brokers can help others avoid falling into the traps set by disreputable brokers and you can share your experiences here. If you want to know more about this particular topic, or have been scammed by a fraudulent broker, you can also contact us at [email protected]


Justin Freeman

Latest news

Forex vs Crypto: What’s Better For Beginner Traders?
The crypto and forex markets are two of the world’s most popular among investors and traders. Read more
Three Great Technical Analysis Tools for Forex Trading
You don’t have to be very technical minded to make use of technical analysis in your forex trading. Read more

Safest Forex Brokers 2024

Broker Info Best In Customer Satisfaction Score
#1 Blackbull LogoYour capital is at risk Founded: 2014 Global Forex Broker
Number One Broker
BEST SPREADS Visit broker
4.8
#2 AvaTrade LogoYour capital is at risk Founded: 2006 Globally regulated broker
Number One Broker
BEST CUSTOMER SUPPORT Visit broker
4.9
#3 * 82% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money Founded: 2008 Global CFD Provider
Number One Broker
Best Trading App Visit broker
5
#4 Between 74-89 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs Founded: 2010 Global Forex Broker
Number One Broker
Low minimum deposit Visit broker
4.9
#5 Forex Broker eToro Logo51% of retail CFD accounts lose money Founded: 2007 Global CFD & FX Broker (*Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment and you should not expect to be protected if something goes wrong. Take 2 mins to learn more)
Number One Broker
ALL-INCLUSIVE TRADING PLATFORM Visit broker
4.9
#6 XM LogoYour capital is at risk Founded: 2009, 2015 and 2017 Global Forex Broker
Number One Broker
Low minimum deposit Visit broker
5
#7 FxPro LogoYour capital is at risk Founded: 2006 CFD and Cryptocurrency Broker
Number One Broker
CFD and Cryptocurrency Visit broker
5

    Forex Fraud Certified Brokers

    BlackBull Logo Small
    FxPro logo
    XM Logo
    AvaTrade logo
    FXTM Logo
    eToro Logo
    CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.